Autoview vs TradersPost
TradersPost is a capable tool, and if your trading lives entirely inside a handful of US retail brokers, it does that job. But for most traders weighing the two, Autoview covers more of what you actually trade. It runs forex, which TradersPost cannot. It connects to far more crypto exchanges. It does options too, the same as TradersPost. And it prices flat per exchange instead of charging you more every time you add an asset class. TradersPost keeps one genuine edge, US retail-broker reach, and the section below is straight about it. Everywhere else, the breadth is Autoview's.
Where they actually differ
Two gaps decide most of this. The first is forex. TradersPost does not do it. Autoview runs forex through OANDA and Capital.com, so a EUR_USD strategy out of TradingView has somewhere to land. The second is crypto breadth. Autoview connects to more than a dozen crypto exchanges including Crypto.com, Kraken, Bybit, OKX, and Coinbase. TradersPost keeps crypto narrower, centered on the US-available names.
TradersPost has a real edge of its own, and it is not options. Both of us do those. Autoview runs US equity options through TradeStation and Schwab, and crypto options through Deribit and OKX. The edge is reach into US retail brokers. TradersPost plugs into names like Robinhood, Interactive Brokers, and Tradier. Autoview's US stock side is Alpaca, TradeStation, and Schwab. If your account sits at a broker only TradersPost connects to, that is a real reason to pick it.
The pricing models are shaped differently
This is the part worth understanding before you pick. TradersPost prices in tiers by how many asset classes you trade. Trade one class, pay the entry tier. Add stocks plus futures plus crypto, climb the tiers. Autoview does not work that way. It is a flat $39.99 per month per exchange, whatever the asset type. So the math flips depending on you. One broker, one class? They are close. Several markets at once? The flat per-exchange model usually wins, and forex tips it further because TradersPost cannot price forex at all.
How each one executes
Both are webhook tools, and neither needs your browser open. You fire a TradingView alert, it reaches the platform, the order goes to your account. TradersPost routes through its connected US brokers. Autoview places directly on your own exchange or broker, with bracket, OCO, and reduce-only available depending on the venue. Same core idea, different reach.
The honest comparison
| Feature | Autoview | TradersPost |
|---|---|---|
| Asset classes | Forex, futures, stocks, options, 20+ crypto exchanges | Stocks, options, futures, crypto (no forex) |
| Forex | Yes, OANDA and Capital.com | No |
| US stock brokers | Alpaca, TradeStation, Schwab | More retail brokers (Robinhood, Interactive Brokers, Tradier) |
| Crypto breadth | More than a dozen exchanges | Narrower, US-available names |
| Pricing model | Flat $39.99 / mo per exchange | Tiered by number of asset classes |
| Free option | Unlimited paper trading on every exchange | 7-day trial |
Which one is for you
For most traders, Autoview. If you trade forex, if you want real crypto breadth, or if you run several markets and would rather pay one flat per-exchange price than climb asset-class tiers, it is the clear pick. TradersPost wins back exactly one reader: the one whose account sits at a US retail broker only TradersPost connects to, like Robinhood or Interactive Brokers, trading only the classes it covers. If that is you, use it. Everyone else gets more market, and a simpler price, from Autoview.
Either way, prove it before you pay. Make a free Autoview account, connect a demo or testnet exchange, and fire a test order. Several connections are free, so you can watch the execution path work with nothing at risk.