Autoview vs Tickerly
Tickerly and Autoview both reach OANDA, both cross crypto and forex, and both take alerts straight from TradingView. So this comparison is not about what each one connects to. It is about what happens once your strategy is live and firing. Tickerly's plans cap how many alerts you get per day, and the cap resets every day whether you used it or not. Autoview charges one flat price per exchange and does not count your alerts at all.
Both reach OANDA and beyond
Tickerly's Level 3 plan and above connect directly to OANDA, alongside Capital.com, Alpaca, and ten total crypto and CFD exchanges; Level 4 adds MetaTrader 4 and 5, which opens the door to well over a thousand MT-reachable brokers. Autoview runs forex through OANDA and Capital.com, futures through Tradovate, US equities and options through Alpaca, TradeStation, and Schwab, and more than a dozen crypto exchanges directly. Neither one locks you into a single asset class once you are on the right tier.
On order types and coverage, the two reach OANDA differently. Autoview connects through OANDA's own REST v20 API, trades in units rather than lots, and supports OANDA everywhere OANDA itself operates except OANDA Global Markets and TMS Brokers S.A. Tickerly's OANDA page describes its own direct API connection with support for multiple take-profit levels and moving a stop-loss to breakeven, but does not publish a region list the way OANDA does. If a specific order type or your region matters to you, confirm it against OANDA's own account terms and Tickerly's setup docs before assuming parity between the two.
The real difference is the daily cap
Tickerly meters by the alert, and the meter resets every day. Level 1 gives you 10 alerts a day for $14 a month, crypto only. Level 2 is $19 a month for 100 alerts a day across three crypto exchanges. Level 3, the plan that unlocks OANDA, is $29 a month for 1,000 alerts a day. Level 4 is $39 a month, still 1,000 a day, with MetaTrader and prop-firm access added; stepping up to the Level 4 Ultra option raises the ceiling to 2,500 alerts a day. Hit your daily cap and the rest of that day's signals do not fire until the reset.
What counts as one alert matters here. Tickerly's own pricing pages count each TradingView alert that fires against your daily cap, whether or not it results in a filled trade, the same way most alert-metered platforms count it. Tickerly's public docs do not spell out every edge case (a rejected order, a duplicate signal), so if your strategy fires more often than it trades, budget for the firing rate, not the trade rate.
Autoview does not meter alerts at all. It is a flat $39.99 a month, or $399.99 a year, per live exchange you connect, and every webhook and every trade on that connection is unlimited, however often your strategy fires. A strategy that sends five alerts a day and one that sends five hundred cost the same.
The honest comparison
| Feature | Autoview | Tickerly |
|---|---|---|
| OANDA / forex | Yes, any plan, direct API | Yes, Level 3 and up ($29/mo+) |
| Daily alert cap | None, any plan | 10 to 2,500/day depending on tier |
| Entry price | $39.99/mo per exchange (unlimited) | $14/mo (Binance only, 10 alerts/day) |
| Price to reach OANDA | $39.99/mo flat | $29/mo minimum, still capped |
| Crypto breadth | More than a dozen exchanges | Up to 10 crypto/CFD exchanges, or 1,300+ via MetaTrader on Level 4 |
| Free option | Unlimited paper trading on every exchange | 30-day free trial on every plan |
Which one is for you
If you trade one crypto pair lightly and ten alerts a day covers it, Tickerly's $14 entry tier genuinely costs less than Autoview. The moment your strategy fires often, or you want OANDA without a per-day ceiling on how many signals get through, Autoview's flat per-exchange price removes the cap entirely. Count your own daily alert volume before you pick either one.
Prove it before you pay. Make a free Autoview account, connect a demo or testnet exchange, and fire a test order with nothing at risk.