Autoview vs ProfitView
ProfitView and Autoview both let a TradingView alert land an order on an exchange, but they get there in very different ways. ProfitView is a coding platform: you write your strategy, and your webhook handler, as Python inside its browser editor. Autoview is a no-code platform: you write a plain alert message using a documented parameter syntax, and there is no code to run or host.
Where they actually differ
The first gap is what you have to build. ProfitView's own docs walk through writing a Python function decorated with `@http.route` to receive a TradingView POST request, then calling its order functions from inside that handler. That is real flexibility for a developer, but it is a coding project, not a configuration step. Autoview's webhook message is a set of named parameters, exchange, symbol, side, quantity, and so on, that the platform parses directly. No handler to write, no code to debug when TradingView changes its alert format.
The second is asset coverage. ProfitView connects to 19 named crypto exchanges and nothing else, no forex, no stocks, no futures brokers. Autoview runs the same account across OANDA and Capital.com for forex, Tradovate for futures, Alpaca, TradeStation, and Schwab for stocks, and more than a dozen crypto exchanges, all through the same alert format.
The pricing models are shaped differently
ProfitView's three tiers gate you by exchange count and realtime symbol count: $29 a month buys 2 exchanges and 5 symbols, $59 a month buys 5 exchanges and 15 symbols, and $299 a month removes the caps entirely. Autoview prices per connection instead: a flat $39.99 a month, or $399.99 a year, per exchange or broker, with no cap on symbols, trades, or strategies on that connection. A trader running two or three crypto exchanges on ProfitView's Hobbyist or Active Trader tier might pay less than the equivalent Autoview connections. A trader who also wants forex or stocks has no ProfitView option at all, only Autoview.
The honest comparison
| Feature | Autoview | ProfitView |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy authoring | No code, documented parameter syntax | Python code in a browser editor |
| Webhook receiving | Built in, no code to write | You write the handler yourself |
| Forex / OANDA | Yes, direct via OANDA and Capital.com | No, crypto only |
| Futures / stocks | Yes, Tradovate, Alpaca, TradeStation, Schwab | No, crypto only |
| Crypto exchanges | 12+ exchanges | 19 named exchanges |
| Pricing | Flat $39.99/mo (or $399.99/yr) per exchange | $29/mo (2 exchanges) to $299/mo (unlimited) |
| Free option | Unlimited paper trading on every exchange | Not stated on the pricing page |
Which one is for you
If you already write Python and want fine-grained control over crypto-only strategies and order logic, ProfitView's coding model gives you that. If you want your TradingView alert to just work, without hosting or debugging a webhook handler, and you trade anything beyond crypto, Autoview is the one built for that.
Prove it before you pay. Make a free Autoview account, connect a demo or testnet exchange, and fire a test order. Several connections are free, so you can watch the execution path work with nothing at risk.